Changing flow range
- Low-flow vortex signals can be small
- One fixed cutoff can remove useful information
- Higher flow shifts the expected vortex frequency
This vortex meter development addresses two separate field problems: changing operating flow and mechanical vibration that can overlap with the true vortex signal, especially near the lower end of the range.

Maximum turndown
1:70
Rated flow coverage
1%–100%
Measurement class
Class 0.5
Dynamic variation
Approx. 75% lower
Two Operating Challenges
Development Approach

Test Setup
A representative program used the in-house airflow and vibration test system to compare the same meter configuration with digital signal-feature analysis disabled and enabled.

Before and After
Recorded dynamic change
Approx. 75% reduction
| Measurement | Feature disabled | Feature enabled |
|---|---|---|
| Static vibration signal | 33–51 Hz | 0 Hz |
| Static flow output | False flow present | 0.000 m³/h |
| Dynamic frequency range | 185–189 Hz | 185–186 Hz |
| Dynamic frequency spread | 4 Hz | 1 Hz |
| Instantaneous flow peak-to-peak variation | Approx. 0.20 m³/h | Approx. 0.05 m³/h |
Image-Supported Validation
The screen captures show the two feature states. Values shown are tied to the recorded test conditions.




Suitable Conditions
Related Developments

Keeps the piezoelectric element outside direct media contact while retaining the vortex signal.
View Details>
Applies controlled airflow and mechanical vibration while recording the meter response.
View Details>
Reviews when a vortex meter can replace an orifice plate in chemical and pharmaceutical utility lines.
View Details>Selection support
Send the minimum, normal and maximum flow together with the vibration source, pipe layout and operating conditions.
